Have a look at

MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession on cpan

(http://search.cpan.org/~drolsky/MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession-0.30/)

Darragh Gammell wrote:
> >From the mason devel Manual we see:
>
> $m, the Mason request object, provides an analogous API for Mason. 
> Almost all Mason features not activated by syntactic tags are accessed 
> via $m methods.
>
> But looking under "HTML::Mason::Request - Mason Request Class" there 
> is no reference to $m->session. This is where I'm getting confused.
>
> Is it possible that whomever wrote this website created their own 
> Object called $m->session and thats why I cant find it anywhere?
>
> My Apologies for the silly questions, trying to get to grips with new 
> technologies with no developers present.
>
> Regards
>
> Darragh
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2007 11:48 AM, Aaron Dalton < [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     $m->session is a Mason construct.
>
>     --
>     Aaron Dalton
>     http://perlkonig.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: 
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
> http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mason-users mailing list
> Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
>   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: 
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users

Reply via email to