D'oh.  I realized that shortly into writing it, subscribed to the list
and then forgot to change the to: line.  My apologies.

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 09:59 +0100, Scott Lanning wrote:
> [this is more for mason-users, n'est-ce pas?]
> 
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
> > We would like to start throwing and handling exceptions to determine
> > the service responsible for causing content problems.
> >
> > Is it possible to specify a <%method> as a catch block for any
> > exceptions thrown within a given lexical scope?
> 
> If by "lexical scope" you could mean "component",
> then there's HTML::Mason::Plugin whose end_component_hook
> can access exceptions thrown during the eval of a component
> (or at the end_request_hook level).
> 
> For a more general "lexical scope", I guess you could wrap
> eval { ... } around the scope and send any $@ to the %method
> in the normal ways.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users

Reply via email to