Hi,

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Jonathan Swartz <swa...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Oliver Paukstadt <pst...@sourcentral.org> wrote:
>>>
>> There is a test for this case as far as I understand line 104 in
>> Mason-2.20/lib/Mason/t/ResolveURI.pm correct. But this one is designed
>> wrong in my eyes. It fits the implementation, not what was reality
>> before the 2.20 release and what is reasonable and expected.

No. That test is for dhandler + index presence.

I've open a new pull request, right now it only has two new test cases
that should work.

https://github.com/jonswar/perl-mason/pull/16

Can you please check and see if the following tests cover what you are seing?

https://github.com/melo/perl-mason/commit/09e99805f25b05301095881596c906db52836a9e#L0R106

The /foo/ is failing, working on that right now.


>> Index files are for being displayed, when a directory is hit. Having
>> them only displayed when allow_path_info is set is like having to define
>> allow_path_info inside of all dhandlers.
>
> Agreed.

+1.

Bye
-- 
Pedro Melo
@pedromelo
http://www.simplicidade.org/
http://about.me/melo
xmpp:m...@simplicidade.org
mailto:m...@simplicidade.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users

Reply via email to