There's nothing wrong with testing out PSGI to see if it makes the errors
go away. Unfortunately, if you can't reproduce the error, it will be hard
to know if you fixed it.
Were you thinking you would use mod_proxy to send dynamic requests to
Starman or something similar? I'm not sure what the most widely
recommended setup is for PSGI these days but that seemed to be the popular
one for a while.
- Perrin
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Louis-David Mitterrand <
vindex+lists-mason-us...@apartia.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some issues with mod_perl+apache_2.4.x.
>
> Is it advisable to switch to PSGI for a Mason web site?
>
> What are the pros and cons?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics
> Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Mason-users mailing list
> Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
