> The answer is very simple: we have a legacy of 150 thousand lines of code
> written
with HTML::Mason and their
> conversion would be very costly because the new Mason is not backward
compatible and converters are not available.
No probs. Just checking
PerlModule Apache2::compat
> We don't use this module in our environment.
> Do you think it is mandatory to use MasonX::Request::ExtendedCompRoot
module?
I commented out that line and nothing bad seemed to happen, so it doesn't
look like it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mason-users mailing list
Mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-users
