/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting!
/* ALSO: Don't quote this header. It makes you look lame :-) */
Jim Cowan wrote:
> I've been trying to get ipmasquerade working. I've searched the
> archives, found a few interesting things but not a case where
> the ipmasq test fails at step 4 (pinging the internet ipmasq
> server ipaddress from a computer on the internal net).
> The system is a linux redhat 6.0:
>
> 2.2.5-15 #1 Mon Apr 19 22:21:09 EDT 1999 i586 unknown
>
> The route table is (netstat -rn):
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 64.30.196.10 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
> 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
> 64.30.196.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
> 0.0.0.0 64.30.196.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
>
> The ifconfig shows:
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:27:1A:21
> inet addr:64.30.196.10 Bcast:64.30.196.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xf800
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:BA:B2:A4:B2
> inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xfce0
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
> RX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
your routing looks ok.
> I can ping the 192.168.0.1 from my windows 98. But I am not able
> to ping the 64.30.196.10. I do see the eth1 RX packet count
> increase.
assuming that the win98 host is on the 192.168.0.0 net,
packets for the default route must arrive on the linux
host's eth1. if they're not arriving, it probably means
that the win98 host doesn't have it's default gateway
configured properly. is it set to 192.168.0.1?
raf
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ --
THIS INCLUDES UNSUBSCRIBING!
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
