/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! /* ALSO: Don't quote this header. It makes you look lame :-) */
>> Do I have any interested testers or auditors out there? >> The new ruleset seems to work well for everything I've tested >> but I want it as robust as possible. > >Sure. I'll give it a look over and testing. I'm pretty sure that this ruleset is pretty decent for the HOWTO though it is pretty verbose. Anyway, if anyone finds any glaring omissions, please let me know. --David [demime 0.97b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of rc.firewall-2.4-stronger] .----------------------------------------------------------------------------. | David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware [EMAIL PROTECTED] | !---- ----! `----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----' _______________________________________________ Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ -- THIS INCLUDES UNSUBSCRIBING! or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting. You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
