/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! 
/* ALSO: Don't quote this header. It makes you look lame :-) */

Chuck PUP Payne wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have been using IP Chains for sometime now, but I have run into a problem
> with my last install SuSE 7.3. I have been able to set up a rule to block a
> group of addresses, but since install SuSE 7.2 my rules no longer work.
> Before the upgrade we have set up that 192.168.0.X  could get out on the
> net. We had set up 192.168.1.X so they couldn't access the net. Now both
> addresses can get out. Has something change that allows anyone out?
> 
> Here the script I was running;
> 
> 
> #! /bin/sh
> #
> ### This flushes all ipchains rules.
> # 
> /sbin/ipchains -F
> 
> #
> ### THIS US UP BOOK RULES
> #
> /sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
> /sbin/ipchains -P input   ACCEPT
> /sbin/ipchains -P output  ACCEPT
> #
> ### ALLOW ACCESS
> #
> /sbin/ipchains -A input 192.168.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT
> #
> ### BLOCK ACCESS
> #
> /sbin/ipchains -A output 192.168.1.0/24 -j REJECT
> #
> ### This is the net device that MASQ
> #
> /sbin/ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.0.0/24 -i eth0 -j MASQ
> 
> 
> This has been the script that we run for two years with no problems. Has
> something change in IP Chains?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chuck Payne

nothing has changed in ipchains but yuor new suse distribution has
a newer kernel? if it has a 2.4 kernel, then you may have to reconfigure
it to support ipchains (rather than iptables) and recompile it.

btw, why don't you block those addresses for incoming packets?

raf

_______________________________________________
Masq maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ -- 
THIS INCLUDES UNSUBSCRIBING!
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.

Reply via email to