/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! */
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Alan Izzo wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't think NAT will work (at least as my far as my
> minimal understanding is). As I understand NAT, it allows you to
> map individual IP addresses to another individual IP address. That
> is to say map 192.168.0.1 to 1.2.3.5 and that is it. You can not
> map a block of IP addresses (i.e. a complete local subnet) to a
> single IP address as masqing does... Am I missing something about
> NAT that would allow me to accomplish what I want?
Well, your description implied to me that you had a block of IP
addresses from your ISP and you wanted them to map one-to-one to
systems behind your firewall. Did I misunderstand?
You can specify more than one set of address translations, so you
could do (for example) an entire class C address space if you wanted.
Were you thinking you could only do one?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Monty Python's Star Trek Voyager:
A successful trans-warp experiment turns Paris and Janeway into
newts, but they get better.
...wait a minute... It's already been done...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
9 days until A Civil Conflict is released
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
