/* HINT: Search archives @ http://www.indyramp.com/masq/ before posting! */
>2.3.x/2.4.x has support for ipchains. You can use the new interface
>(preferred) or you can load module ipchains.o and continue to use your
>existing rules. Mixing the two is bad magic and I will not be responsible
>if you turn into a frog. :)
Thats a bummer it won't co-exist. For those of you out there that haven't
heard, the new IPTABLES subsystem will even take old IPFWADM commands
too!
>2.5.x reportedly will drop ipchains support.
Ahhhh.. ok.
>I'm still trying to get my brain properly wrapped around the new interface.
So what do think people, should the IP Masq HOWTO be extended to support
IPTABLES or should we start a whole new HOWTO? The reason why I'm concerned
about this is because IPTABLES might have a complete different behavior
(quirks, etc) and the old MASQ module support might be very different.
Thoughts?
--David
.----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| David A. Ranch - Linux/Networking/PC hardware [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
!---- ----!
`----- For more detailed info, see http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch -----'
_______________________________________________
Masq maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Admin requests can be handled at http://www.indyramp.com/masq-list/ -- THIS INCLUDES
UNSUBSCRIBING!
or email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PLEASE read the HOWTO and search the archives before posting.
You can start your search at http://www.indyramp.com/masq/
Please keep general linux/unix/pc/internet questions off the list.
