I'm running into problems trying to find
a PDC on an NT box behind a proxy.
All the packets are being masq'ed,
but I'm bad password errors on the PDC,
and my machine never successfully gets
hold of a network logon.  I have DNS resolution
for Windows shares turned on, as well as
trying with and without WINS (pointing to a
server on the hidden side of the proxy).

When I put the machine on the public net,
it can log on fine.  Is NetBIOS over TCP/IP
doing something either through service
announcements or logons that won't pass
through a proxy?

Any thoughts?
--
Bill Eldridge
Radio Free Asia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Helder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dave Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, June 11, 1998 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] IP - masquerade setup problems


>Wow, I learned alot from this message and have my ip masquerading working
>great!
>
>The problem was what dave had suggested and my IP masquerading was
disabled.
>
>I enabled it at the command line and I was in business.
>
>Thanks everyone
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dave Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thursday, June 11, 1998 6:41 PM
>Subject: Re: [masq] [masq] [masq] IP - masquerade setup problems
>
>
>
>You need to 'ipfwadm -F -p deny' first to set a default policy. then
>you can 'ipfwadm -F -a ...' to append forwarding rules to the default
>policy. Re-read the last sentence you quoted below.
>
>On 11 Jun 98 at 17:01, Bill Eldridge wrote:
>
>>From the man page:
>>
>>         These  rules regulate the acceptance of incoming IP
>>              local  network  interfaces  are checked against the
>>              input firewall rules.  The first rule that  matches
>>              with a packet determines the policy to use and will
>>              also cause the rule's packet en byte counters being
>>              adapted.   When  no  matching  rule  is  found, the
>>              default policy for the input firewall is used.
>>
>>
>>If you deny everything first, then any packet will match
>>that denial, and be rejected.  (which is the same way
>>Ciscos do it).  Unless I'm horribly confused.
>>--
>>Bill Eldridge
>>Radio Free Asia
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Joachim Feise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Bill Eldridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Cc: Steve Helder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, June 11, 1998 4:54 PM
>>Subject: Re: [masq] [masq] IP - masquerade setup problems
>>
>>
>>>Bill Eldridge wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Order matters, so if you deny everythingfirst, then the rules never
>>meet the allowclauses later.  As mmy first guess.--
>>>
>>>That is not quite right, actually, it is wrong.
>>>For security reasons, you always should deny everything first, and
>>subsequently
>>>allow things like forwarding.
>>>Did you enable forwarding in the proc fs? Try adding this line to your rc
>>>script:
>>>echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>>>
>>>Oh, and please don't send HTML-formatted messages. ASCII is preferred (I
>>hope I
>>>didn't copy the tags over when I copied the text).
>>>
>>>-Joe
>>>
>>>>  Bill Eldridge
>>>>  Radio Free Asia
>>>>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>        -----Original Message-----
>>>>        From: Steve Helder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>        Date: Thursday, June 11, 1998 2:36 PM
>>>>        Subject: [masq] IP - masquerade setup problemsI am attempting to
>>use IP-Masquerading on a newly
>>>>        installed Redhat 5.1 Linux box.  I am connected to my ISP using
>>PPP and can ping the nameservers from
>>>>        Linux.  I have followed the instructions in the Linux IP
>>Masquerade mini HOWTO by Ambrose Au for setting
>>>>        up my Windows 95 machine.  After I set it up I can ping the
>>ethernet card on the Linux box which is
>>>>        10.0.100.5 but can't get any further. (pinging the nameservers)
I
>>have setup the ipfwadm  -F -p deny and
>>>>        ipfwadm  -F -a m S 10.0.100.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 on the Linux box.
>I
>>am assuming I am close but missing
>>>>        something. Any assistance would be appreciated Steve Helder
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Joachim Feise                  Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
>>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
>>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]                       mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>>additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For daily
>>digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to