Rereading the West Roxbury BOI report

The front windows were broken at approximately the same time that
Engine 30 repositioned their line

There was a flare up (obvious in the photos)

The pictures from the kitchen show that dishes were not burnt nor
damaged; the wok was not tipped nor burnt

Maybe this was primarily a carbon monoxide deflagration (maybe a
carbon monoxide rich area ignited with a moderate overpressure event)
shortly after the hose stream disturbed the ceiling tiles and the
front windows were broken - I dont see any mention of debris being
blown out of the restaurant - note that the front desk did not burn

If there was a lot of grease in the ceiling area, I might expect more
scattered scorch marks throughout the kitchen - maybe even speckles of
fire throughout the kitchen and dining area. There is mention of one
dime sized burnt mark on one turnout coat.

One firefighter had a cut on his head, and there was blood on his
helmet - this was not mentioned on the death certificate

One firefighter had extreme fire damage to his mask and turnout coat
and SCBA. The other firefighter had no damage to his SCBA nor
turnouts.

Maybe the hoselines kept the fire out of the dining room after the
flame up, but were not able to penetrate into the kitchen to protect
the 2 firefighters who died. On the other hand, the wok did not burn.
So I guess the fire in the kitchen was not a complete burnout.

It seems that a matter of inches were at play here. Maybe 1
firefighter got tangled in flaming debris - and the other took just 1
breath of fire. Maybe one of those new FIT bombs would have been
useful to immediately kill the fire in the kitchen. Maybe the FIT can
be connected to a detector to serve as a "instant RIT".

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"massfire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/massfire?hl=en.

Reply via email to