sorry - this stretched out into a big long post / rant http://www.npr.org/blogs/goatsandsoda/2014/12/01/364749313/ebola-in-the-air-what-science-says-about-how-the-virus-spreads
different droplet size accounts for different spread rates - or something like that ------------------------------------------------------- Rant starts here Lets look at this from the "open and transparent" angle. 1. One or two YEARS after the outbreak begins, we get this article in the mainstream media. 2. Absolutely no mention of sweat in this article. 3. If the CDC removed the word "sweat" from their posters without telling anyone, what faith should we have in the CDC? 4. If sweat was a problem - then sweat wasnt a problem - whats to stop sweat from changing back to a problem tomorrow? (ie predictability - normalcy - in the real world, gravity is constant, sunrise is constant, nightime is constant - they happen everyday - they dont change - they always happen - they are predictable - they are normal - versus - any advice that swings wildly 180 degrees is very abnormal) 5. The fact that we dont see bodies in the streets, and the fact that social media and mainstream media are not reporting bodies in the streets; this is probably the best evidence that Ebola is not spreading wildly in the USA. AKA - why should I listen to the government if all the evidence I need is right in front of me? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "massfire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/massfire. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
