If Cohen's testimony was a con, what would it look like? It would probably contain some information that looks and sounds scandalous, but which would be actually legally innocuous.
The testimony would probably also contain some major arguments which were presented as minor points. These major arguments would probably be totally false. ------------------------------------ What if the 'heroic' committee chairman was also a huge con man? What if his good 'friend' on the committee was also a major conman - and racist? Why would they tearfully proclaim their love for each other in a fully televised "public meeting"? "Public meeting" - a legal term - a meeting with preset parameters mandated by the rule of law. Which could be perverted by a finely tuned shitshow. ------------------------------------ Any police detectives out there? Isnt one of the best investigatory techniques to get the witness riled up? Did not seem that Cohen ever got riled up during his public testimony. What did he say in secret testimony during the 2nd day? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "massfire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/massfire. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
