re karen read case - lets make 2 timelines 1. read hits john o'keefe (JOK) - pieces of taillight are left at 34 fairview
2. read hits JOK - no pieces of taillight are left at 34 fairview case 1 - someone would have stepped on the pieces at 630 am and noticed them - maybe just one person ... ... from fd or pd mentioned pieces of red and white glass at 34 fairview at 630 am - need to check this out - seem to remember 1 person testifying to this case 2 - if taillight was intact when read arrived at 1 meadow rd - she had all night to do something ... ... but why would she? that would just bring negative attention to her - but the driveway camera clearly shows a big piece of taillight missing as she drives off - the light from the floodlight shows this lets try this scenario - higgins punches out jok on lawn - leaves him for dead - read has no clue - read damages taillight backing out of garage - someone grabs the pieces at 1 meadow rd and takes them away - everyone lies about what they saw at 34 Fairview that could work slightly different scenario - alberts kill jok in 34 fairview - put body on lawn - put drinking glass pieces on lawn also - read has no clue - someone grabs the taillight pieces at 1 meadow rd that could work also -- shes got a kid ... together - https://youtu.be/IQQ-hxIwm70?si=8jrwZRcfZg-vN4Ye&t=237 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "massfire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/massfire/CAFXWwKZQdAQG1h2vxYFh_p-5BdvO3n7yZ5F8x7EsErRN9JYicg%40mail.gmail.com.
