https://youtu.be/kbZc2PBvLNA?si=H0bS0sEcDfOwW8v1
a comment from 4 days ago The force needed to break the red lense is not the important, and case-ending, point of the video. What REALLY matters is that if the CLEAR DIFFUSER was broken and left at 34 Fairview as the CW claims, then the video of Karen leaving Meadows Ave would show NO light at all! So, even the CW's doctored video proves that the CLEAR DIFFUSER INSIDE THE TAILLIGHT WAS INTACT when Karen left Meadows Ave after hitting the Traverse. THAT is the case-cracking "smoking gun." If the diffuser was intact, thus allowing light to shine in the Meadows Ave video, then someone had to have removed it and planted it at 34 Fairview AFTER Karen hit the Traverse. In other words, the CW's own video of Karen leaving Meadows Ave PROVES that the clear pieces of plastic were planted, and it proves it definitively. Sure, the video also shows that John's arm didn't break the light, but that is not what is so powerful about the video. What is powerful, and completely and definitively devastating to the CW's case, is that the CLEAR PLASTIC WAS STILL INTACT, and thus NOT sitting on the ground in pieces at 34 Fairview. Karen was framed, and this fact proves it beyond any doubt. ================== still trying to digest all of this info karen read - canton mass - police corruption - john o'keefe On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 1:32 PM Peteri Szerlagi <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://x.com/BoozeyBeauty/status/1899365999767400609 > > finally someone gets around to this > > what did they find? dont know - have not watched the video yet -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "massfire" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/massfire/CAFXWwKZhcta0_%3DWxQC7_o4pM345V%2B_rUrE9%3DTDa%2Bpqo46Q3uLA%40mail.gmail.com.
