Dear colleagues, The requested feature of transit ASN visibility in RIPEstat will become available as of September 2015.
Kind regards, Christian & Romeo On 15/05/28 14:15 , Christian Teuschel wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I wanted to follow-up on Job's feature request, about RIPEstat also > displaying prefixes transited by an ASN, since several of you also said > you would find this feature useful. > > Supporting this feature will require some work on RIPEstat's front-end > as well as on the back-end (our Hadoop storage platform). Implementing > this for all available historic RIS data would have a large impact on > our storage capacity. However, we will be able to implement this feature > for a sliding window of 30 days, as you suggested. So RIPEstat will be > able to show the prefixes for which an ASN provided transit during the > previous 30 days. > > At the moment I don't have a concrete delivery date for this feature, > but we will merge the necessary development work into our work plan and > let you know before the end of June when we expect to be able to support > this feature in RIPEstat. We will make sure it is implemented before > RIPE 71 in November. > > Please let me know if you have any further feedback or questions. > > Regards, > > Christian Teuschel & Romeo Zwart > RIPE NCC > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 01:15:09PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: >> Hi MAT, >> >> I'd really like the stat team to implement a tool that tells me >> what prefixes are originated AND transitted by a given ASN. The >> use-case is that I (before setting up BGP sessions) can make an >> automated assessment what amount of prefixes the network will >> announce, which prefixes they are likely to announce and if that >> matches up with the prefix-filter I would apply on that bgp >> session. >> >> A second use case is that when I want to connect a peer or customer >> to which I have never been connected before, I have no idea what >> they will announce to me. Should I want to make predictions for >> traffic engineering purposes, it would be beneficial if I could >> fetch a list of prefixes this peer is likely to announce to other >> peers from the stat system. >> >> A sliding window of say 30 days would be perfect, for my purposes I >> do not need the tool to offer data going back to the beginning of >> time. >> >> Do others agree that the above would be a useful feature? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Job >> > >
