Dear all, On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 08:49:41PM +0000, Massimo Candela wrote: > On 17/10/2019 17:27, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote: > > I would propose that we make the role of MAT WG in providing > > information and advice to the RIPE NCC's tools teams more explicit. > > In this proposal, [email protected] mailing would be considered a > > primary channel for proposals for features for RIPE Atlas.
What other channels exist today? I know of some: - https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas/ - hallway discussions - issues filed in github Perhaps other channels exist as well? It is hard to control what channels exist, but we can try to make sure they all are inputs to the same people. I think it is a great idea to confirm with RIPE NCC that their R&D staff closely monitor all discussions on this mailing list (and engage where they can contribute) as part of their normal duties. Kind regards, Job
