On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:33:42AM +0200, jehan wrote:

>> Indeed! I can happily report that there is no segfault with r331. Though
>> I haven't tested much yet. 
>> 
> 
> Anyway as there is a deep change of tabs gestions, report me if there
> is any tab-related issue. I don't think there will be memory issues as
> I updated the tab creation and deletion as expected. But I didnt'
> really looked at some other use of tabs when it didn't touch to memory
> gestion, like moving tabs. Of course I tried: and from what I saw it
> was still working perfectly. But maybe in some very specific cases,
> there can be side effects? 

No issue with moving tabs. All we do is swap the VT pointers :).

> If you see any strange things, report me so that I see further... 

Perhaps we should run it through valgrind to make sure there are no
leaks. Alternately maybe we could print some debugging info when you
realloc the command buffers (just to see what's going on).

GI

-- 
'Stress' -- The confusion created when ones mind overrides the body's
basic desire to choke the living crap out of some butthead who
desperately needs it.

Attachment: pgpcYI293Xxxx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Materm-devel mailing list
Materm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/materm-devel
mrxvt home page: http://materm.sourceforge.net

Reply via email to