On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 09:52, Alex Efros wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:32:10AM -0300, Martin Sarsale wrote: > > > 2. Is it possible to have https:// with mathopd? > > > > if you're not planning to have a lot of traffic on the ssl server, you > > may try to use stunnel to create a local tunnel, from 0.0.0.0:443 to > > 127.0.0.1:80 > > Hmm... what's the problem with lot of traffic with this solution? What will > differ from, for example, Apache's way to do https (in a term of performance)?
afaik stunnel uses a fork model (when using inetd, im not sure when running standalone, but I guess it does the same), so if you have lots of traffic you will have lots of processes you can try this using "siege" (a http benchmark solution). it can simulate any number of concurrent users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
