Hi Uwe, Yes, that makes sense. But also reminds me that way more than that should be in the news file. Matlab mode used to do a lot of stuff that now has native support in emacs which changes how to configure things. Sadly I didn't think to build a news like file for them other than all the check-in logs. I could work on that but it will be a day or two as I'm doing family stuff this week.
Some of the summary of changes is in an email I put together a month or so ago, but not at the right detail level. Eric On Sun, Jun 20, 2021, 9:06 AM Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> wrote: > >>> "EL" == Eric Ludlam <ericlud...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > Sounds like a fine idea to me. I posted a change to the hairyblocks > > branch that will use the function name, or text after the cell start > > as the 'defun' for add log. > > > The hairyblocks branch has been stable for a while with a lot of > > developers at MW using it. It should be ready to merge into the main > > branch whenever you are ready for it. > > > > I am just running into a problem with the hairyblocks branch. > > I want to insert an empty line, in a matlab.m file hitting > the return key, but I receive the following error > > ,---- > | Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function matlab-return) > | signal(void-function (matlab-return)) > | help-fns--analyze-function(matlab-return) > | help-fns-function-description-header(matlab-return) > | describe-function-1(matlab-return) > | describe-key((([return] . [return]))) > | funcall-interactively(describe-key (([return] . [return]))) > | call-interactively(describe-key nil nil) > | command-execute(describe-key) > `---- > > Indeed my personal binding had (I don't know for how long) > (local-set-key [return] 'matlab-return) > > > Eyeballing the changelog, I find > Remove matlab-comment-indent as a setting (use nil) > │ (matlab-return-function, matlab-return, matlab-plain-ret) > │ (matlab-indent-after-ret, matlab-indent-end-before-ret) > │ (matlab-semicolon-on-return, matlab-indent-before-ret) > │ (matlab-linefeed): > > Which I interpret that you removed matlab-return. > > So I suggest that before I merge that branch into master, we had into > the NEWS file and entry were we tell which functions have been removed > in order to avoid users complains. > > What do you think? > > Uwe > >
_______________________________________________ Matlab-emacs-discuss mailing list Matlab-emacs-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matlab-emacs-discuss
