Hi Uwe,

Yes, that makes sense.  But also reminds me that way more than that should
be in the news file.  Matlab mode used to do a lot of stuff that now has
native support in emacs which changes how to configure things.  Sadly I
didn't think to build a news like file for them other than all the check-in
logs.  I could work on that but it will be a day or two as I'm doing family
stuff this week.

Some of the summary of changes is in an email I put together a month or so
ago, but not at the right detail level.

Eric

On Sun, Jun 20, 2021, 9:06 AM Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> wrote:

> >>> "EL" == Eric Ludlam <ericlud...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > Sounds like a fine idea to me.  I posted a change to the hairyblocks
> > branch that will use the function name, or text after the cell start
> > as the 'defun' for add log.
>
> > The hairyblocks branch has been stable for a while with a lot of
> > developers at MW using it.  It should be ready to merge into the main
> > branch whenever you are ready for it.
>
>
>
> I am just running into a problem with the hairyblocks branch.
>
> I want to insert an empty line, in a matlab.m file hitting
> the return key, but I receive the following error
>
> ,----
> | Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function matlab-return)
> |   signal(void-function (matlab-return))
> |   help-fns--analyze-function(matlab-return)
> |   help-fns-function-description-header(matlab-return)
> |   describe-function-1(matlab-return)
> |   describe-key((([return] . [return])))
> |   funcall-interactively(describe-key (([return] . [return])))
> |   call-interactively(describe-key nil nil)
> |   command-execute(describe-key)
> `----
>
> Indeed my personal binding had (I don't know for how long)
>   (local-set-key [return]  'matlab-return)
>
>
> Eyeballing the changelog, I find
>   Remove matlab-comment-indent as a setting (use nil)
> │  (matlab-return-function, matlab-return, matlab-plain-ret)
> │  (matlab-indent-after-ret, matlab-indent-end-before-ret)
> │  (matlab-semicolon-on-return, matlab-indent-before-ret)
> │  (matlab-linefeed):
>
> Which I interpret that you removed matlab-return.
>
> So I suggest that before I merge that branch into master, we had into
> the NEWS file and entry were we tell which functions have been removed
> in order to avoid users complains.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Uwe
>
>
_______________________________________________
Matlab-emacs-discuss mailing list
Matlab-emacs-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matlab-emacs-discuss

Reply via email to