>> so I think it does make sense to bring the common names that show up in >> math expressions into the main namespace.
>> This is probably best just done by each individual according to his/her >> taste. > > That's what I'm trying to get away from. I want to be able to write > the contains() function in patch.py and just use the normal math where > it makes sense to use normal math. Ahh -- we're back on an a mpl-devel topic now. I was thinking that you were proposing a "math" namespace for pylab users -- but it sounds like you're proposing a standard set of math names that will be brought in to modules for the matplotlib project itself. Different issue. I don't write enough MPL internal code to have any opinion on that. Does anyone else think this is a good idea? -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
