On Jul 20, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> However, I have seen a real shift on the numpy list over the last year
> (or two), toward using the namespace.
Yes, I do that to, primarily in scripts. However, for interactive
sessions, I usually import into the top namespace. I imagine others
might as well. Particularly people coming from environments like
matlab will initially want everything up top.
Separate namespaces are great. I still think from
pylab import *
should not overlap with from
numpy import *
I don't think it would be hard to make sure that there are no
duplicate function names in the top namespace. E.g., mpl load could
be put in mpl, matplotlib, or mpl_io, or something similar.
People will migrate to separate namespaces eventually, as they get
more familear with python, but they will be annoyed initially with
any overlaps.
-Rob
----
Rob Hetland, Associate Professor
Dept. of Oceanography, Texas A&M University
http://pong.tamu.edu/~rob
phone: 979-458-0096, fax: 979-845-6331
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
