On Nov 28, 2007 9:21 PM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 7:55 PM, Charles Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So should I bother with binary releases for 0.91.0? I assume you > > meant 0.91.1 below as well. > > Yes, I meant 91.1 and yes, we should go ahead with the binary > releases. The only way we can find any bugs in the current release, > including any problems we may see with the binaries, is to put out > 91.0 in full bloom.
Alternatively, if it is not much more work since you haven't built the binaries to get the latest snapshot with Michael's fix and just release it as 91.1 now, that would be great too. I just think we need to get a full release out so people can and will test on a variety of systems before we can assume that the important bugs are out. JDH ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
