On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. If there were a meta-class usage that was crystal-clear after a > little inspection, and that actually made the code easier to understand and > maintain, I would consider it. > > I know that when we talked in Kona I was complaining about decorators, but > they are here to stay, and as long as they are not too tricky they can be > fine. The @staticmethod form is an improvement over the non-decorator > equivalent, an assignment at the bottom of the method. I would be happy to > see Mike's commented-out @staticmethod lines uncommented, and the > corresponding assignments at the bottom of the method deleted, for example. > > Requiring 2.4 would also let us remove the subprocess module--not a big > deal, but an incremental simplification of the mpl package. All these sound like good suggestions to me... JDH ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
