On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't quite what I was suggesting (and seems to be equivalent to
> the code as before). In the common case where there are no units in the
> data, this will still traverse the entire list.
>
> I think replacing the whole loop with:
>
> converter = self.get_converter(iter(x).next())
>
> would be even better. (Since lists of data should not be heterogeneous
> anyway...)
Hmm, I don't see how it would traverse the entire list
for thisx in x:
converter = self.get_converter( thisx )
return converter
since it will return after the first element in the loop. I have no
problem with the iter approach, but am not seeing what the problem is
with this usage.
JDH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
