On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Jae-Joon Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, I think it would also good if we allow a dictionary > for the "fancybox" argument, like "bbox" in text. But maybe not in > this release. I would prefer not to change the meaning of the fancybox once we release it, if we can help it. The best two choices are: * add support now for the dict before the release (handling the rc to accept a dict may require a little extra work) * keeping fancybox as is but adding an optional fancyprops dict later I can go either way, but I am disinclined to intentionally change the semantics of fancybox once we have released it we can help it ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
