Sure, I thought it was going to the list too ;) So no problem. I am not sure what you can do with that module. It seems a shame to waste. Perhaps it should be split out into a seperate 3d only plotting library that cares less about being matplotlib'ish than something packaged with MPL would. What do you think?
Jon. On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >> I posted only to you by a mistake -- can I reply to the list? > > Oops, I posted to the list by mistake too -- sorry about it. Anyway, > here is the email that I sent to Jonathan only by a mistake: > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jonathan Taylor > <jonathan.tay...@utoronto.ca> wrote: >> Just because we are using all the 2D drawing code to make the plots, >> which is why the 3d code is so small, maintainable and is visually >> consistent with 2D matplotlib. I believe that moving to OpenGL would >> require a substantial effort. > > Ok, now I understand the motivation. So if one wanted to go the OpenGL > route, it would have to be created as a matplotlib backend? Then the > 3D plots would be fast enough. > > Ondrej > > > > and he replied in my previous email, that I just wanted to ask if I > can post to the list. > > Ondrej > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
