John Hunter wrote:
> In general, only very clear bugfixes which are unlikely to result in
> "surprise" breakages should go in.  The _png patch, though a bug fix,
> has more of the feel of a feature enhancement, and given its
> complexity, should probably not go in to the branch unless someone
> makes a compelling case (though I am very excited to see it go in to
> the trunk).
>   
OK, I wasn't sure about it when I put it in. Shall I back it out?

> We are not that far away, at least for src snapshots, os x binaries,
> and the docs.  The windows binary would take some work, as would a
> linux binary, eg a debian package.
FWIW, the Debian packagers will want to make their own .debs from the
source package.

Also note that the Windows binaries may take more effort than normal --
Python 2.6 is built with a different MS compiler than before.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to