Multiline equations are not currently supported by the mathtext engine. It's the alignment stuff that makes it more than just a "throw a vbox together". It's a good feature request -- go ahead and add it to the tracker if you're really interested in it -- but I don't know if I'll have time to do this myself in the near future. I'm happy to help show someone around the code...
Of course, in your case, you could also investigate one of the other math rendering directives included with Sphinx. Mike Fernando Perez wrote: > Hi all, > > in the NIPY documentation, we're heavily taking advantage of mpl's > math support, and for the most part it's working great. But having it > in there, we may have gotten a bit carried away... If you look at this > page: > > http://neuroimaging.scipy.org/site/doc/manual/html/users/glm_spec.html > > its reST sources here: > > http://neuroimaging.scipy.org/site/doc/manual/html/_sources/users/glm_spec.txt > > Contain text like: > > /begin quote > """ > Typically, the events occur in groups, say odd events are labelled > *a*, even ones *b*. We might rewrite this as > > .. math:: > > E = \delta_{(t_1,a)} + \delta_{(t_2,b)} + \delta_{(t_3,a)} + \dots + > \delta_{t_{10},b} > > This type of experiment can be represented by two counting processes > :math:`(E_a, E_b)` defined as > > .. math:: > > \begin{aligned} > E_a(t) &= \sum_{t_j, \text{$j$ odd}} 1_{\{t_j \leq t\}} \\ > E_b(t) &= \sum_{t_j, \text{$j$ even}} 1_{\{t_j \leq t\}} > \end{aligned} > > These delta-function responses are effectively events of duration 0 > and infinite height. > > """ / end quote > > In the final PDF > (http://neuroimaging.scipy.org/site/doc/manual/nipy.pdf) that all > renders fine, since it's 'real' latex doing the work. However, the > HTML linked above renders the first equation fine, while the multiline > one doesn't work. > > Is this something possible with today's MPL but where we are just not > making the right calls, or is it a missing feature. If the latter, is > it realistic to expect it to be added, or should we rather plan for > avoiding such type of typesetting in our docs or switching math > engines for the html docs? Or is the feature 'almost there' but > slightly buggy? > > Any hints much appreciated, I just wasn't sure whether this would be a > bug report, feature request or just seeking advice... > > Cheers, > > f > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. > Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com > _______________________________________________ > Matplotlib-devel mailing list > Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel > -- Michael Droettboom Science Software Branch Operations and Engineering Division Space Telescope Science Institute Operated by AURA for NASA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
