On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 14:48, Brian Granger<ellisonbg....@gmail.com> wrote: > Michiel, > > Thanks for the ideas. I have implemented both of the approaches you > describe and I am attaching a file that has all 3 approaches. At this > point, all 3 approaches work on OS X, Python 2.5 with wx 2.8/2.9. What I > most need to to find strenuous test cases that can probe which of these has > the best performance? Robert, could you run the Chaco test again with > approaches 2 and 3 and try tuning the parameters (see the docstrings)?
#2 was pretty good out-of-box. #3 was slightly better than #1 but still noticeably chunky. Reducing the sleep down to 0.01 instead of 0.05 made things appreciably smooth. I thought I noticed a tiny bit of chunkiness, but I certainly didn't do a double-blind trial. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
