I'm about to upload a new patch that implements some of the ideas John and
Darren have sent. Would you mind running the performance tests against that
one also?  This new change has the potential to increase performance drag.

Jason

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Firing [mailto:efir...@hawaii.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, 13 August, 2009 15:37
> To: John Hunter
> Cc: Jason R. Coombs; Darren Dale; matplotlib development list
> Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] kwdoc processing with decorators
> 
> 
> I tested the startup time for r7480 before and after the patch, and the
> difference is quite small--of the order of a percent--so I have no
> objection to the patch on that account.  Or, for that matter, on any
> other account.  I would not object to applying it (or a modification,
> if
> there is still fine-tuning to be done) to the trunk.  It seems to work
> fine.  John, I assume you have tested doc building with the patch in
> place.  I have not.
> 
> Eric

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to