Michael Droettboom wrote: > Thanks. The subslicing optimization added in 0.99 was truncating the > polar path. Subslicing has been made more "cautious" now and will only > be applied when the axes are rectilinear and non-logarithmic. > > Interestingly, there was already a test in the test framework for this > bug, but the baseline image was wrong :) I see you fixed that, too -- thanks. I can't remember the history of this one particular test -- I think maybe I inherited it without a test image or perhaps I just over-enthusiastically copied a broken image without realizing it as such.
These unit tests have already shown their worth I think (fixing non-deterministic layout, getting a grip on freetype, etc.), and their value in preventing mistakes and regressions from creeping in is hard to perceive but I think is also very real. As more and more tests are added (and broken baseline images and test cases are fixed), the number of regressions will almost certainly drop. -Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
