On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> wrote: > Mmh, back to this one: I do think it would be something useful to have > somewhere, because typing draw() after *every* operation when working > interactively does get tiresome, it seems to me... If we encourage > calling subplots() for new teaching, then we do want it to be as > pleasant as pyplot to use interactively, I think... >
I think the first issue that needs to be addressed is whether we want to encourage OO api in the interactive mode (I mean, when a user expect the figure gets updated as soon as a command is executed). Using *subplots* does not necessarily mean that we need to use OO api, since we now have *sca* in the pyplot namespace. So. how other developers think? Are we going to encourage OO api in the interactive mode? Regards, -JJ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
