On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:27 PM, John Hunter <jdh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Eric Firing <efir...@hawaii.edu> wrote: > > John et al., > > > > Is this a reasonable time to put out 1.0.1? There have been quite a few > > bugfixes and other cleanups since 1.0. Most likely the biggest problem > with > > 1.0 is my error in the tk show(), which you tripped over, and which > prompted > > the thread below. > > I've been meaning to ask you the same thing :-). We probably need to > have a go at the bug tracker before 1.0.1, but I am happy to do a > bugfix release as soon as we are ready. > > Or perhaps we should be a little more aggressive on our numbering. > Ie, bugfix releases could be 1.1.0 and 1.0.1, a micro release would be > for installer fixes and the like. > > major numbers: significant new features, minor API breakage > minor numbers: significant bugfixes and near guaranteed API compat > micro: minor bugfixes, API compat > > I think 1.0 understates the maturity of the project so we may want to > get to 2.0 in less than 10 years :-) > > JDH > > Couldn't we just do what Google does and put a "Beta" label on everything? "Matplotlib Beta" Sounds almost like a planet or something... Ben Root
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
