On Jan 22, 2011 2:28 PM, "Eric Firing" <efir...@hawaii.edu> wrote:
>
> On 01/22/2011 07:06 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Benjamin Root<ben.r...@ou.edu> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Darren Dale<dsdal...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Friedrich Romstedt
> >>> <friedrichromst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I want to set up a git mirror for matplotlib, but I 1) have some
minor
> >>>> problems and 2) want to know what others think about this.
> >>>
> >>> Late last year, I did some work to convert the svn repository to git.
> >>> The code to d the conversion is available at
> >>> https://github.com/darrendale/mpl2git . The resulting git repo is
> >>> available at https://github.com/darrendale/matplotlib . I have not
> >>> pursued the project further because there did not seem to be enough
> >>> interest in migrating from svn/sourceforge to git/github to justify
> >>> investing more of my time in the project.
> >>>
> >>>> I'm a native git user and I don't know how to use svn properly.
> >>>
> >>> I read that as "uninterested in learning how to use svn", and such
> >>> sentiment is probably a fact of life as many (most?) open source
> >>> projects move to DVC. In my opinion, matplotlib is likely to draw more
> >>> contributors if it lowers barriers to entry and uses a DVCS that is
> >>> growing in popularity, like git/github.
> >>>
> >>> Darren
> >>>
> >>
> >> In discussions with Ryan May on the prospect of switching over to git,
it
> >> sounds like we have a "Bike Shed" problem where we (the main
developers)
> >> agree that we agree that a bike shed should be built, but we can't
agree on
> >> the color to paint it...
> >
> > In my view, the issue has nothing to do with bikeshedding.
>
> Agreed. We *did* agree to move to git, and the only problem was that
> most of us lack the expertise and time to be of much help in actually
> getting it done. I think there was a bit of a hangup over the question
> of migrating the bug tracking; but I suspect we could agree that this is
> a secondary question, and that any such migration, if desired, can be
> done at leisure *after* taking the primary step of switching the code
repo.
>
> >
> >> I think the main source of the huge download size is the data that is
coming
> >> from the basemap toolkit. I do not think that it would be a good thing
to
> >> have everyone and their mother needing to do a 'git clone' on their
computer
> >> and find they have to pull down 500+ MB of stuff to get matplotlib. It
is
> >> because of this that a straight-forward migration from svn to
matplotlib
> >> won't be possible.
> >
> > The git repo at https://github.com/darrendale/matplotlib does not
> > include anything from basemap.
>
> The key point being that you are converting matplotlib/trunk/matplotlib,
> not matplotlib/trunk; the latter is what includes py4science, toolkits
> (including basemap), sample_data, etc. I think this is the right
approach.
>
> This doesn't all have to be perfect; it just has to be good enough. I
> suspect your conversion is good enough. If you are reasonably
> confident, then I think that if you go ahead and set up a github repo as
> the new official source tree, along with posting whatever notices are
> needed for anyone accessing the svn tree, the active developers will say
> "thank you!", and it will be done.
Thanks Eric, that's encouraging. I am reasonably confident, but in the
spirit of code review/cya, I would feel better if another dev chimed in that
they were also reasonably confident without having to take my word for it.
> The other person who has been most interested in the nuts and bolts of
> the conversion is Andrew Straw. Although he is evidently very short of
> mpl time these days, you might want to try to contact him directly to
> see if he has thought of anything you might have overlooked.
>
> I would like to be included in the group with git write access, unless
> there is a clear decision to restrict this group to a very small core of
> gatekeepers.
>
> Eric
>
> >
> >> What have been the proposed solutions to dealing with basemap's data?
> >
> > Separate repo?
> >
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
> Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better
price-free!
> Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires
> February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
