On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Darren Dale <dsdal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That said, I have the conversion routines set up right now to create a
> separate "toolkits" repository, which currently includes all the
> contents of trunk/toolkits. I can tailor this further to split the
> toolkits up and create a repository for each, if thats how people want
> to do it. Those repos could either be hosted as separate repositories
> under the matplotlib github organization, or maybe better as a
> repository under a separate github project. In case of the latter, I
> can temporarily publish the repository at my own account, long enough
> for Jeff to clone it (don't fork it using githubs fork button!) and
> push it to its final destination.

I think mplsize should just be moved into lib/mpl_toolkits so it can
be picked up by a default mpl installation.  It's small enough that it
probably doesn't need it's own repo.  What do you think Andrew?

I think natgrid could be moved into the same directory because it is
small too, but because of licensing issues I don't think it should be
built and installed by default.  Could you handle this move Jeff, on
fairly short notice?

Is there any reason basemap should not be hosted by the mpl
organization?  Seems like the logical place to me.

JDH

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to