On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 21:55, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Benjamin Root <ben.r...@ou.edu> wrote: >> That's valid. I guess I am just wondering if there is a decent error >> message to the user explaining that the test could not proceed. > > Rig the test runner to properly skip them instead of failing? The > test data should be considered a dependency for those tests, and > absent the dependency, the users simply get less tests, but not a ton > of failures. > > Not saying this should be done *now*,
+1 Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-devel mailing list Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
