On 2012/10/14 12:17 AM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Eric Firing <efir...@hawaii.edu> wrote:
>> That would be my preference; but has Mike written anything about where PEP8
>> changes should go?
>
> All I can find is this: https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/1153
>

Thanks.  It's better than nothing, but hardly crystal-clear as guidance 
for the present situation.

Mike's idea, as a compromise, was to "put some cleanup things (such as 
this) prior to the RC" but after creation of the branch.  It is now well 
past rc3.  It seems to me that putting such massive changes in now means 
that we should get them all in, then have another RC, and then wait a 
while.

In addition, if this is to be the course of action, I think it would be 
better to rebase each PR against v1.2.x prior to review and merging so 
that we can be inspecting exactly the changes that will be made to 
v1.2.x, instead of cherry-picking.  I did ask Mike earlier about 
cherry-picking backwards versus merging maintenance into master, and he 
confirmed that the latter remained the normal practice.

My first choice would still be to not put any of the PEP8 things in 
1.2.x, and absolutely minimize future changes on 1.2.x, freezing it ASAP.

Eric

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to