Thanks a ton, Mike! Great not to have to worry about this on our side.

cheers,

f

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Michael Droettboom <md...@stsci.edu> wrote:
> Just to close the loop on this, I have created:
>
> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2139
>
>
> On 06/18/2013 07:18 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> Good point, I didn't know about that new mechanism.
>
> I think we should keep 2.6 support for IPython 1.0, but drop it
> afterwards. We can discuss that during the dev meeting...
>
> Cheers,
>
> f
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Thomas Kluyver <tho...@kluyver.me.uk>
> wrote:
>
> On 19 June 2013 00:09, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wish we could just fix this plugin issue.
>
> When we drop support for Python 2.6, I think we can use the expectedFailure
> mechanism included in unittest from 2.7 onwards. So long as nose recognises
> that, we should be able to drop our copy of the KnownFailure plugin.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>



-- 
Fernando Perez (@fperez_org; http://fperez.org)
fperez.net-at-gmail: mailing lists only (I ignore this when swamped!)
fernando.perez-at-berkeley: contact me here for any direct mail

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel

Reply via email to