As a point of clarification, is this proposed 2.0 release different from
the 1.5 release?
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Phil Elson <pelson....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Many of you will be aware of there has been an ongoing issue (#875,
> http://goo.gl/xLZvuL) which recommends the removal of Jet as the default
> colormap in matplotlib.
>
> The argument against Jet is compelling and I think that as a group who
> care about high quality visualisation we should be seriously discussing how
> matplotlib can move beyond Jet.
>
> There was recently an open letter to the climate science community
> <http://www.climate-lab-book.ac.uk/2014/end-of-the-rainbow/> asking for
> scientists to "pledge" against using rainbow like colormaps (such as Jet),
> and there are similar initiatives in other scientific fields, as well as
> there being a plethora of well researched literature on the subject.
>
> As such, it's time to agree on a solution on how matplotlib can reach the
> end of the rainbow.
>
>
> The two major hurdles, AFAICS, to replacing the three little characters
> which control the default colormap of matplotlib are:
>
> * We haven't had a clear (decisive) discussion about what we should
> replace Jet with.
> * There are concerns about changing the default as it would change the
> existing widespread behaviour.
>
> To address the first point I'll start a new mailinglist thread (entitled
> "Matplotlib's new default colormap") where new default colormap suggestions
> can be made. The thread should strictly avoid "+1" type comments, and
> generally try to stick to reference-able/demonstrable fact, rather than
> opinion. There *will* be a difference of opinion, however the final
> decision has to come down to the project lead (sorry Mike) who I know will
> do whatever is necessary to make the best choice for matplotlib.
>
> The second point is a reasonable response when we consider that matplotlib
> as a project has no *clear* statement on backwards compatibility. As a
> result, matplotlib is highly change averse between minor releases (to use
> semantic versioning terms) and therefore changing the default colormap is
> unpalatable in the v1.x release series. As a result I'd like to propose
> that the next release of matplotlib be called 2.0, with the *only* major
> backwards-incompatible change be the removal of Jet as the default colormap.
>
> As a project matplotlib mustn't get caught up in the trap of shying away
> from a major version release when the need arises, and in my opinion
> helping our users to avoid using a misleading colormap is a worthy cause
> for a v2.0.
>
> Please try to keep this thread on the "how", and not on the "what" of the
> replacement default colormap, for which there is a dedicated thread.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil
>
> (#endrainbow)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
> from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
> with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
> Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
> Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-devel mailing list
Matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
