On Monday 05 February 2007 05:23:04 pm John Hunter wrote: > On 2/5/07, Darren Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I respectfully disagree. The current behavior is consistent with other > > output formats, such as png. If we want to support tight bounding boxes, > > maybe it would be better to do so with a kwarg. > > I'm happy to be wrong (especially because then we don't have any work > to do) but I don't see the tight bounding box as inconsistent with > Agg's behavior. I agree that the *.ps output should be consistent > with the Agg png behavior since neither make a claim to clip the image > to the visible elements. But *.eps implies a bounding box, it might > make sense to offer a bounding box that is reduced to the visible > elements.
Maybe I'm confusing two issues. I'm comparing png's image extent with eps's bounding box. > I certainly don't feel strongly, nor do I think it would be terribly > hard to do..... Perhaps reducing the image size to the visible elements would be a good option for all output formats? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-users mailing list Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
