On Thursday 17 January 2008 09:05:53 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Darren Dale wrote:
> > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:22:45 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
> >> But reading Darren's new bug report makes me wonder if my fix was
> >> correct.  To be honest, I'm a little confused by the bug report, not out
> >> of any lack of clarity on Darren's part, but I think due to insufficient
> >> understanding of the problem.  As assumption about the purpose of cla is
> >>   that is should return the plot to a pristine state -- and in this case
> >> that means linear axes.  But are you suggesting that sometimes that is
> >> not the case?
> >
> > If you have hold=True, and the x or y scale is log, repeated calls to
> > plot() will add new lines to the plot without changing the scaling. If
> > hold is instead False, one might reasonably expect that future calls to
> > plot would replace the old line with the new one, again without changing
> > the scaling. That would be consistent. Instead, the scaling changes.
>
> That indeed is a problem.  I suspect it has something to do with the
> extra step that log scales do to "round" to the nearest decade.  I can
> have a look when I get a chance, or let me know if you'd like to tackle
> it, Darren.

I don't know when I would have a chance to look into this (my wife and I are 
trying to buy a house). 

Darren

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Reply via email to