Christopher Barker wrote:
> Tommy Grav wrote:
>>> I
>>> don't know that it has ever all been consolidated into one easy-to- 
>>> find, easy-to-use set of instructions that will work for just about anyone.
> 
> no, it hasn't.
And one of the reasons may be that it is very complicated in practice, 
with all the possible variations of OSX versions, Xcode versions, 
processor architectures, and styles of build for python itself and 
various libraries.  It seems to require learning a whole new jargon.
> 
> However, I think:
> 
> $ easy-install matplotlib
> 
> should work, at least with the python.org python2.5
> 
>>> Maybe someone can provide, or has provided, a universal binary of  
>>> 0.91.2  built against numpy 1.1?
> 
> does it need to be "built against" numpy at all? I didn't think it was a 
> build-time dependency -- that is, any MPL 0.91.2 should do, and you can 
> drop a new numpy into it. I don't know if there is one yet, though...

_backend_gdk.c and nxutils.c both call into the numpy C API; maybe some 
c++ code does also.  It is not entirely clear to me whether 1.1 is 
sufficiently binary-compatible that this is safe.


> There are essentially two options:
> 
> 1) built it just for yourself -- I think the instructions John H. posted 
> are pretty easy to follow.

That's the way they look, but having watched someone try it, I can 
testify that looks are deceptive.  I would say that with 95% 
probability, if Tommy tried to follow John's instructions, he would not 
succeed.

Eric

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Reply via email to