If I do:
t1=datetime.datetime(2008,06,02,01,0,0)
t1=datetime.datetime(2008,06,02,02,0,0)
tVec1=drange(t1,t2,datetime.timedelta(seconds=1))
tVec2=drange(t1,t2,datetime.timedelta(seconds=5))
tVec3=nan*ones(tVec1.shape)

I cannot do something like:
for i in tVec2:
  tVec3[where(tVec1==i)]=i

tVec3[0] is written, yet the others are not.

print tVec1[0]
 > 733195.083333

print tVec1
 >[ 733195.08333333  733195.08334491  733195.08335648 ...,   
733195.50376352
733195.5037751   733195.50378667]

There is more precision in the second statement and, I believe, the  
result for no matches inside the for loop.
Is this the desired behavior?

I can do:
vec1=arange(0,100,1)
vec2=arange(0,100,5)
vec3=nan*ones(tVec1.shape)
for i in vec2:
  vec3[where(vec1==i)]=i

thanks,
Brian

-- 
Brian E. McLaughlin
Oceanographic Research Specialist
Department of Oceanography
School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Honolulu, HI 96822
--
e:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p:808.956.7625
f:808.956.9516
--


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Reply via email to