On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Christopher Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sure that would work, but John's make target 'build_osx105' is > much easier, particularly for end users. > > $ make build_osx105 > > That's it. Unpythonic in it's appearance, but sets the required > CFLAGS and calls setup.py.
What Charlie is saying is my solution will result in a slower mpl than his, since my solution uses a lower optimization level for all files, and he uses the lower level only on the problematic files. But the make solution has the advantage of being a one step automatic build, and I'm not looking for great performance on my laptop usually... JDH ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-users mailing list Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
