On 3/21/2009 11:33 PM Gary Ruben apparently wrote:
> Whilst agreeing with Kaushik's sentiments on the greatness of 
> matplotlib, I thought his example plot nicely illustrates a layout wart 
> that I think is easily fixed by changing the default xtick.major.pad, 
> xtick.minor.pad, ytick.major.pad and ytick.minor.pad values from 4 to 6.
> As well as preventing the x- and y-axis labels running into each other 
> in Kaushik's example, the most common case of a 2D plot with 0 lower 
> bound on both the x- and y-axes [e.g. plot(rand(10))] looks better with 
> the default font when pad=6.

Yes indeed.
I would like to see examples justifying the current default.
Alan Isaac
(another user)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Reply via email to