John Hunter wrote: > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Andrea Gavana <andrea.gav...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 21 February 2010 15:44, Alan G Isaac wrote: >>> On 2/21/2010 10:29 AM, Wayne Watson wrote: >>>> plot(2.8,3.4) doesn't work in my program >>>> >>> Why should it? >> I believe it should. > > It does in svn -- though it unhelpfully plots a line segment with one > vertex (invisible). Eric, I think you added this support. For length > one sequences, perhaps we should default to a marker?
I don't think so; this strikes me as a step too far. Anyone plotting a single point should know that they need a marker, and that they have to specify which marker to use. If they don't know it, they need to learn it PDQ. There is a limit to the usefulness of trying to guess, or provide defaults, and providing a default marker for this case is beyond that limit. A reasonable argument could be made that I should not even have added the non-sequence support. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Matplotlib-users mailing list Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
