2010/3/26 timothee cezard <tcez...@staffmail.ed.ac.uk>:
> does it make sense to use something like
> plt.bar(bins, nb_per_bin, width=(max(bins)-min(bins)) / (1.5*len(bins)))
I think that should work, although you should use (max(bins) -
min(bins) / 1.5 / (len(bins) - 1), but I would suggest:
bounds = {some N + 1 array}
center = 0.5 * (bounds[1:] + bounds[:-1])
width = 0.9 * (bounds[1:] - bounds[:-1])
offset = 0.5 * width
plt.bar(center - offset, {some N array}, width = width)
but I haven't tested it. bar() does accept an iterable as *width* argument.
Friedrich
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
