I just had a quick look, but while extra "restore" could be a problem,
the erroneous one may not be the one at line 1073, but the one at line
1066.

I believe that the "restore" at 1073 is written by "pstoeps" function
in backend_ps.py, and this function did write a matching "save" at
line 11.

Regards,

-JJ




On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Thomas Robitaille
<thomas.robitai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that removing 'restore' on line 1073 of the test_tex_r8216.eps file 
> fixes the problem, although I don't understand postscript well enough to 
> understand why that is.
>
> Thomas
>
> On Apr 2, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
>> Can you provide us with the EPS file?  What version of LaTeX is this?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Thomas Robitaille wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I upgraded to the latest svn version of matplotlib today, and found that 
>>> eps files produced with the system latex now seem to be invalid. For 
>>> example, if I run the following script
>>>
>>> import matplotlib
>>> matplotlib.use('Agg')
>>> import matplotlib.pyplot as mpl
>>>
>>> mpl.rc('text', usetex=False)
>>>
>>> fig = mpl.figure()
>>> ax = fig.add_subplot(1,1,1)
>>> fig.savefig('test_notex.eps')
>>>
>>> mpl.rc('text', usetex=True)
>>>
>>> fig = mpl.figure()
>>> ax = fig.add_subplot(1,1,1)
>>> fig.savefig('test_tex.eps')
>>>
>>> and try running pstopdf on them (on MacOS 10.6) I get the following
>>>
>>> air:air tom$ pstopdf test_tex.eps %%[ Warning: Empty job. No PDF file 
>>> produced. ] %%
>>> air:air tom$ pstopdf test_notex.eps air:air tom$
>>> So the file with the system LaTeX enabled no longer works. ps2pdf still 
>>> works, but the error with pstopdf is important, because for example 
>>> Preview.app on mac relies on pstopdf, not ps2pdf.
>>>
>>> I tried this on two different computers under MacOS 10.6, and tried with 
>>> ghostscript 8.70 and 8.71 installed, and the problem occurs either way.
>>>
>>> Does anyone know what might be causing this? I submitted a bug report a 
>>> little while back about this
>>>
>>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2974953&group_id=80706&atid=560720
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for any help,
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Matplotlib-users mailing list
>>> Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Droettboom
>> Science Software Branch
>> Operations and Engineering Division
>> Space Telescope Science Institute
>> Operated by AURA for NASA
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Matplotlib-users mailing list
> Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Matplotlib-users mailing list
Matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-users

Reply via email to